Key result
A computer-aided detection system for pulmonary embolism on CT angiography yielded a sensitivity of 53.3%, specificity of 77.5%, and a 42% false-negative rate compared to radiologists.
Why the study?
What is the diagnostic performance of a computer-aided detection system for pulmonary embolism on CT angiography compared to radiologist interpretation?
Observational (n=104)
What is the diagnostic performance of a computer-aided detection system for pulmonary embolism on CT angiography compared to radiologist interpretation?
The evaluated CAD system for pulmonary embolism detection showed low sensitivity and high false-negative rates, indicating a need for technological improvement before it can reliably supplement radiologist interpretation.
CAD showed limited sensitivity for PE; leaves open its adjunct role pending algorithm improvements in prospective studies.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism on computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and four pulmonary CT angiograms for pulmonary emboli (PE) were reviewed both by radiologists and a CAD detection system (ImageChecker CT V2.0, R2 Technology Inc, Sunnyvale, CA). CT scans, read and reported by radiologists in a routine daily clinical setting, were later processed by the CAD system. The performance of the CAD system was analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-five PE were identified by the radiologists in 15 patients. The CAD system revealed 123 findings, interpreted by the system as PE. Twenty-six of them, detected in 8 patients, represented true-positive results. Ninety-seven (78.9%) CAD findings were not true PE and were defined as false-positive. Nineteen true PE in 7 patients were missed by the CAD system constituting 42% false-negative rate. Sensitivity of the CAD system was 53.3% and the specificity was 77.5%. The positive predictive value of CAD system was 28.5% and the negative predictive value was 90.7%. CONCLUSIONS: With the evaluated CAD system, it is relatively simple and fast to check all detected findings and decide if they represent true PE. However, high false-negative results demand technologic improvement, to increase the sensitivity of the system. It is anticipated to become a promising supplement to the work and eyes of the radiologist in detecting PE on pulmonary CT angiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maizlin et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Pulmonary embolism (n=104). Computer-aided detection (CAD) system vs. Radiologists was evaluated on Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (sensitivity). A computer-aided detection system for pulmonary embolism on CT angiography yielded a sensitivity of 53.3%, specificity of 77.5%, and a 42% false-negative rate compared to radiologists.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: