Key result
Computer-aided detection matches established scores for PE severity and strongly correlates with right heart failure.
Why the study?
Few quantitative studies directly evaluate methods for determining pulmonary embolism severity, and new CAD methods may help define its relationship to right heart failure.
Does computer-aided detection (CAD) accurately evaluate pulmonary embolism severity and correlate with right heart failure compared to Mastora and Qanadli scores in patients with pulmonary embolism?
Observational
Does computer-aided detection (CAD) accurately evaluate pulmonary embolism severity and correlate with right heart failure compared to Mastora and Qanadli scores in patients with pulmonary embolism?
Effect estimate: R=0.80
p-value: p=0.00
Computer-aided detection provides a reliable, automated method for evaluating pulmonary embolism severity that correlates strongly with right heart failure, performing comparably to established manual scoring systems.
CAD-based PE severity metrics may link to RHF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before any clinical role.
BACKGROUND: There are few quantitative studies that directly evaluate methods of determining pulmonary embolism (PE). New computer-aided detection (CAD) methods for measuring PE may help in defining the relationship of PE to right heart failure (RHF). OBJECTIVES: We used CAD to investigate the severity of PE and explored whether the severity of PE was associated with RHF. METHODS: A fully automatic calculation conducted by CAD was made of the embolism area/lumen area, which was used to evaluate the severity of the PE. The vascular obstruction index (VOI) was also used to evaluate PE, using the Mastora and Qanadli scores. Paired t tests were used to compare the severity of PE evaluated by Mastora or Qanadli score, to the severity determined by CAD. Correlation between the severity of the PE and RHF was also evaluated by Spearman's rank correlation analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the PE evaluated by Mastora compared with the measurement by CAD (P= 0.720), and also no difference between evaluation by Qanadli and automatic measurement by CAD (P= 0.617). The severity of PE evaluated by Mastora, Qanadli, and CAD had significant positive correlation with RHF (R= 0.75 P= 0.01, R= 0.69 P= 0.02, R= 0.80 P= 0.00). CONCLUSION: We found strong correlation between RHF and the severity of PE evaluated by CAD, and the method was found to be simple and reliable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Pulmonary embolism and right heart failure. Computer-aided detection (CAD) vs. Mastora and Qanadli scores was evaluated on Correlation between the severity of pulmonary embolism and right heart failure (R=0.80, p=0.00). Computer-aided detection for evaluating pulmonary embolism severity was comparable to established scores and strongly correlated with right heart failure (R=0.80, P=0.00).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: