Key result
Defective RNAs derived from the avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus successfully expressed biologically active chicken gamma interferon both in vitro and in vivo in chicken embryos.
This study demonstrates that avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus defective RNAs can be used as vectors to express biologically active heterologous genes both in vitro and in vivo.
Hypothesis-generating for IBV defective RNAs as avian gene vectors; leaves open translation beyond chicken embryos.
Coronavirus defective RNAs (D-RNAs) have been used for site-directed mutagenesis of coronavirus genomes and for expression of heterologous genes. D-RNA CD-61 derived from the avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) was used as an RNA vector for the expression of chicken gamma interferon (chIFN-gamma). D-RNAs expressing chIFN-gamma were shown to be capable of rescue, replication, and packaging into virions in a helper virus-dependent system following electroporation of in vitro-derived T7 RNA transcripts into IBV-infected cells. Secreted chIFN-gamma, under the control of an IBV transcription-associated sequence derived from gene 5 of the Beaudette strain, was expressed from two different positions within CD-61 and shown to be biologically active. In addition, following infection of 10-day-old chicken embryos with IBV containing D-RNAs expressing chIFN-gamma, the allantoic fluid was shown to contain biologically active chIFN-gamma, demonstrating that IBV D-RNAs can express heterologous genes in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hackney et al. (2003) studied this question. D-RNA CD-61 derived from avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) expressing chicken gamma interferon was evaluated on Expression of biologically active chicken gamma interferon. Defective RNAs derived from the avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus successfully expressed biologically active chicken gamma interferon both in vitro and in vivo in chicken embryos.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: