Key result
Handheld echocardiography detects early RHD with ~79% sensitivity and ~87% specificity vs standard portable devices.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,420)
Blinded review by cardiologists
10% of children undergoing standard portable echocardiography were randomly assigned to also undergo handheld echocardiography
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: The World Heart Federation (WHF) guidelines for rheumatic heart disease (RHD) are designed for a standard portable echocardiography (STAND) machine. A recent study in a tertiary care centre demonstrated that they also had good sensitivity and specificity when modified for use with handheld echocardiography (HAND). Our study aimed to evaluate the performance of HAND for early RHD diagnosis in the setting of a large-scale field screening. METHODS AND RESULTS: STAND was performed in 4773 children in Gulu, Uganda, with 10% randomly assigned to also undergo HAND. Additionally, any child with mitral or aortic regurgitation also underwent HAND. Studies were performed by experienced echocardiographers and blindly reviewed by cardiologists using 2012 WHF criteria, which were modified slightly for HAND--due to the lack of spectral Doppler capability. Paired echocardiograms were performed in 1420 children (mean age 10.8 and 53% female), resulting in 1234 children who were normal, 133 who met criteria for borderline RHD, 47 who met criteria for definite RHD, and 6 who had other diagnoses. HAND had good sensitivity and specificity for RHD detection (78.9 and 87.2%, respectively), but was most sensitive for definite RHD (97.9%). Inter- and intra-reviewer agreement ranged between 66-83 and 71.4-94.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HAND has good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of early RHD, performing best for definite RHD. Protocols for RHD detection utilizing HAND will need to include confirmation by STAND to avoid over-diagnosis. Strategies that evaluate simplified screening protocols and training of non-physicians hold promise for more wide spread deployment of HAND-based protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beaton et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Rheumatic heart disease (n=1,420). Handheld echocardiography (HAND) vs. Standard portable echocardiography (STAND) was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity for early rheumatic heart disease detection (Sensitivity 78.9%, Specificity 87.2% (97.9% sensitivity for definite RHD)). Handheld echocardiography showed 78.9% sensitivity and 87.2% specificity for early RHD detection compared with standard portable echocardiography, with 97.9% sensitivity for definite RHD.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: