Why the study?
The field of electrophysiology in paediatric cardiology patients and adults with congenital heart disease is complex and rapidly growing, requiring standardized training recommendations that acknowledge European diversity.
The Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology provides a structured curriculum for training in pediatric and congenital electrophysiology across three levels of expertise.
Training recommendations for pediatric congenital EP are feasible across diverse centers; leaves open prospective validation of competency outcomes.
The field of electrophysiology (EP) in paediatric cardiology patients and adults with congenital heart disease is complex and rapidly growing. The current recommendations for diagnostic and invasive electrophysiology of the working group for Cardiac Dysrhythmias and Electrophysiology of the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology acknowledges the diveristy of European countries and centers. These training recommendations can be fulfilled in a manageable period of time, without compromising the quality of training required to become an expert in the field of paediatric and congenital EP and are for trainees undergoing or having completed accredited paediatric cardiologist fellowship. Three levels of expertise, the training for General paediatric cardiology EP, for non-invasive EP and invasive EP have been defined. This Association for European EP curriculum describes the theoretical and practicsal knowledge in clinical EP; catheter ablation, cardiac implantable electronic devices, inherited arrhythmias and arrhythmias in adults with congenital heart defects for the 3 levels of expertise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kriebel et al. (2020) conducted a review in Training in diagnostic and interventional electrophysiology for paediatric and congenital heart disease. Training recommendations was evaluated. The Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology has established a curriculum and three levels of expertise for training in diagnostic and interventional electrophysiology.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: