Why the study?
Does intravenous L-arginine supplementation improve endothelial function and ameliorate myocardial ischemia in a patient with genetic L-arginine deficiency?
Does intravenous L-arginine supplementation improve endothelial function and ameliorate myocardial ischemia in a patient with genetic L-arginine deficiency?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This editorial highlights that endogenous L-arginine is essential for endothelial NO synthesis, and its intravenous supplementation can restore endothelial function and ameliorate ischemia in patients with genetic L-arginine deficiency.
Nitric oxide (NO) is derived from the oxidation of the semiessential amino acid L-arginine by the NO synthases. Evidence supporting a central role for L-arginine in the NO synthase pathway comes from several observations. First, NO synthesis by cultured endothelial cells depends upon L-arginine content of the media (1). In addition, NO synthesis is blocked by L-arginine analogues (2), such as NG-monomethyl-L-arginine. Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous compound known to inhibit NO synthases (3), and L-glutamine, which inhibits the generation of L-arginine from L-citrulline by argininosuccinate synthetase (4), also impair endothelial NO synthesis (5). Conversely, supplemental L-arginine improves endothelial function (6) and reverses endothelial dysfunction (7). In this issue of the JCI, Kamada and colleagues (8) report the results of vascular studies of an individual with a rare genetic disorder of L-arginine metabolism that lends further support to the critical role of L-arginine in NO synthesis. The authors describe a patient with a rare autosomal recessive disorder, lysinuric protein intolerance, characterized by a defect in dibasic amino acid transport caused by mutations in the SLC7A7 gene. The subject is a compound heterozygote carrying two different putative null alleles. The transporter is normally expressed in intestinal and renal epithelial cells, and deficient expression leads to impaired dietary uptake of exogenous L-arginine and impaired renal tubular reabsorption of filtered L-arginine. As a result, plasma L-arginine concentration in the patient is considerably lower than normal (reduced by 79%). In view of the effect of this genetic experiment of nature on plasma L-arginine concentrations and the importance of L-arginine on vascular NO production, Kamada et al. assessed NO-dependent endothelial function in this patient before and after intravenous L-arginine supplementation. They found that his serum level of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and his flow–mediated brachial artery vasodilator response were each approximately 70% lower than in controls. Intravenous infusion of L-arginine caused an increase in NOx levels and restored normal flow–mediated vasodilator responses in this patient, whose coronary arteriogram was normal. Exercise treadmill testing and positron emission tomography (using [13N]-ammonia) of the heart both showed evidence of myocardial ischemia, which could be ameliorated by intravenous administration of L-arginine. In addition to these abnormalities in vasomotor function, an earlier report showed that this patient also had a reduced circulating platelet count, increased plasma levels of the thrombin-antithrombin III complex, and elevated plasma fibrin(ogen) degradation products. Importantly, intravenous L-arginine increased the platelet count and reduced the levels of thrombin-antithrombin III complex and fibrin(ogen) degradation products (9), as well. Taken together, these complementary clinical studies confirm that endogenous L-arginine is essential for endothelial NO synthesis and demonstrate that a naturally occurring deficiency of endothelial NO production is associated with endothelial dysfunction, manifest as abnormal vasomotor tone and a prothrombotic state. Significantly, replenishing the substrate by intravenous administration of L-arginine restores normal endothelial function. These data support the view that endothelial NO derived from L-arginine maintains tissue perfusion by its vasodilator and antithrombotic effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joseph Loscalzo (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: