Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are blood-circulating, innate-like lymphocytes that contribute to tumor immunosurveillance and constitute over 95% of Vδ2 + γδ T cells, but how they perform antitumor or protumor functions remains unclear. Here, we comprehensively characterized Vδ2 + γδ T cells in paired peripheral blood and tumor samples from patients with renal cell carcinoma using flow cytometry and single-cell transcriptomic analysis. We identified two major Vδ2 + γδ T cell subsets distinguished by expression of CD16, which were present at variable proportions in both circulation and tumors. Notably, the proportion of CD16 + Vδ2 + γδ T cells in blood closely reflected those in matched tumor tissues. Functionally, CD16 + Vδ2 + γδ T cells exhibited potent cytotoxic capacity, characterized by high granzyme B expression and enhanced degranulation upon activation. In contrast, CD16 – Vδ2 + γδ T cells displayed central and effector memory features, expressed higher levels of CCR5, CXCR3, and granzyme K, and showed superior migratory capacity but limited cytotoxic activity. Single-cell RNA sequencing of tumor-infiltrating Vδ2 + γδ T cells identified four transcriptional clusters, including FCGR3A + cytotoxic and GZMK + inflammatory clusters corresponding to CD16 + and CD16 – subsets, respectively. A TOX + cluster exhibited progenitor-like features, giving rise to two divergent effector states along a differentiation trajectory. Within tumors, both CD16 + and CD16 - γδ T cells were broadly distributed and CD16 + γδ T cells were more preferentially co-localized with tumor cells than CD16 - γδ T cells. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that blood and intratumoral Vδ2 + γδ T cells are functionally heterogeneous and segregate into cytotoxic and inflammatory effector programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: