Key result
Higher GDF-15 levels in patients with cancer were independently associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.10-1.33 per doubling), but failed to improve VTE prediction models.
Why the study?
Patients with cancer face increased thromboembolic risk, but the predictive utility of GDF-15 in this population remained undefined.
Does GDF-15 predict the risk of VTE, ATE, and mortality in patients with cancer?
Cohort (n=1,531)
Does GDF-15 predict the risk of VTE, ATE, and mortality in patients with cancer?
Hazard Ratio: 1.21 (95% CI 1.1–1.33)
GDF-15 is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with cancer but does not independently predict VTE or ATE, nor does it improve established VTE risk models.
BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thromboembolic/thrombotic events (ATEs). Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) improves cardiovascular risk assessment, but its predictive utility in patients with cancer remains undefined. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association of GDF-15 with the risks of VTE, ATE, and mortality in patients with cancer and its predictive utility alongside established models. METHODS: The Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS)-a prospective, observational cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent cancer-which was followed for 2 years, served as the study framework. Serum GDF-15 levels at study inclusion were measured, and any association with VTE, ATE, and death was determined using competing risk (VTE/ATE) or Cox regression (death) modeling. The added value of GDF-15 to established VTE risk prediction models was assessed using the Khorana and Vienna CATScore. RESULTS: Among 1531 included patients with cancer (median age, 62 years; 53% men), median GDF-15 levels were 1004 ng/L (IQR, 654-1750). Increasing levels of GDF-15 were associated with the increased risks of VTE, ATE, and all-cause death ([subdistribution] hazard ratio per doubling, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.03-1.32], 1.30 [95% CI, 1.11-1.53], and 1.57 [95% CI, 1.46-1.69], respectively). After adjustment for clinically relevant covariates, the association only prevailed for all-cause death (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.10-1.33) and GDF-15 did not improve the performance of the Khorana or Vienna CATScore. CONCLUSION: GDF-15 is strongly associated with survival in patients with cancer, independent of the established risk factors. While an association with ATE and VTE was identified in univariable analysis, GDF-15 was not independently associated with these outcomes and failed to improve established VTE prediction models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nopp et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Newly diagnosed or recurrent cancer (n=1,531). Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) was evaluated on All-cause death (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.10-1.33). Higher GDF-15 levels in patients with cancer were independently associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.10-1.33 per doubling), but failed to improve VTE prediction models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: