Key result
The presence of cancer in patients with acute coronary syndrome was associated with a significantly higher rate of hospital cardiovascular complications (71% vs 43%, p=0.01) and urgent complications (56% vs 13%, p<0.001).
Why the study?
To evaluate clinical features of ACS in patients with oncological diseases and determine the role of GDF-15, NT-proBNP, and hs-CRP biomarkers in short- and long-term prognoses.
Does the presence of oncological disease and elevated biomarkers (GDF-15, NT-proBNP, hs-CRP) predict worse hospital and 6-month outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Observational (n=88)
No
Does the presence of oncological disease and elevated biomarkers (GDF-15, NT-proBNP, hs-CRP) predict worse hospital and 6-month outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Absolute Event Rate: 71% vs 43%
p-value: p=0.01
In patients with acute coronary syndrome, the presence of comorbid cancer is associated with a more severe clinical course, higher biomarker levels (GDF-15, NT-proBNP, hs-CRP), and increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death at 6 months.
May refine ACS prognosis in cancer patients; leaves open whether GDF-15, NT-proBNP, or hs-CRP alter management.
Aim To evaluate clinical features of the course of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with oncological diseases (OD) and to determine the role of biomarkers GDF-15, NT-proBNP, and hs-CRP in short-term and long-term prognoses.Material and methods In 88 patients (34 patients with ACS and OD and 54 patients with ACS without OD), complaints and historical, objective, and laboratory and instrumental data were evaluated and blood concentrations of GDF-15, NT-proBNP, and hs-CRP biomarkers were measured on the first day of hospitalization. Incidence of cardiovascular complications (CVC) and outcomes of hospital and long-term (6 months) periods were analyzed. Statistical analysis of results was performed with the Statistica 12.0, MedCalc 19.1.7 software. The level of statistical significance was р<0.05.Results In the ACS+OD group as compared to the ACS without OD group, the onset of disease was mostly atypical, with shortness of breath and/or general weakness; the ACS+OD patients more frequently had III-IV Killip class acute heart failure (29 and 7 %, р=0.01); mean hemoglobin concentration (125.6±27.9 and 141±16.6 g/l, р=0.003), prothrombin index (76.4±15.2 and 84.9±17.6 %, р=0.003), and left ventricular ejection fraction (47.7±6.1 and 50.7±7.2 %, р=0.02) were lower; and median concentrations of GDF-15 (1.95 [1.3; 2.8] and 1.45 [1.2; 2.0] ng/ml, р=0.03), NT-proBNP (947.3 [517.8; 1598.2], and 491.1 [85.1; 1069.1] pg/ml, р=0.006), and hs-CRP (14.1 [8.15; 36.75] and 7.8 [4.4; 16.2] mg/l, р=0.01) were higher. The presence of OD was associated with development of CVC, including urgent endpoints in the long-term and also increased the probability of fatal outcome within 6 months after discharge from the hospital. To predict the risk of CVC in patients with ACS and OD, two models with high prognostic values (AUC>0.9) were proposed. In the long-term, the value of NT-proBNP (cut-off point >524.5 pg/ml) was a statistically significant predictor for development of endpoints with a high predictive value (AUC>0.8).Conclusion The features of the clinical course of ACS in patients with OD indicate the importance of isolating such patients into a separate group. Additional use of the developed models, along with a standard risk assessment by the GRACE scale, will allow individualized management of patients with ACS and OD during the hospital and long-term (6 months) periods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Шаленкова et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=88). Cancer (oncological disease) vs. No cancer was evaluated on Hospital cardiovascular complications (p=0.01). The presence of cancer in patients with acute coronary syndrome was associated with a significantly higher rate of hospital cardiovascular complications (71% vs 43%, p=0.01) and urgent complications (56% vs 13%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: