Key result
The deep inspiration breath hold technique using Abches significantly reduced the mean heart dose (2.52 vs. 4.53 Gy, p < 0.001) compared to free breathing in patients undergoing left-sided breast irradiation.
Why the study?
Does the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique using Abches reduce cardiac radiation dose compared to free breathing in patients undergoing left-sided breast irradiation?
Observational (n=25)
No
Does the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique using Abches reduce cardiac radiation dose compared to free breathing in patients undergoing left-sided breast irradiation?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.52% vs 4.53%
p-value: p=<0.001
The DIBH technique using Abches significantly reduces radiation doses to the heart and LAD in patients undergoing left-sided breast irradiation, potentially lowering the risk of radiation-induced cardiac toxicity.
Abches-assisted DIBH was associated with lower heart dose in left breast RT; supports cardiac sparing but leaves open randomized confirmation of outcomes.
PURPOSE: We explored whether the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique using Abches during left-sided breast irradiation was effective for minimizing the amount of radiation to the heart and lung compared to free breathing (FB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February and July 2012, a total of 25 patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent two computed tomography scans each with the DIBH using Abches and using FB after breast-conserving surgery. The scans were retrospectively replanned using standardized criteria for the purpose of this study. The DIBH plans for each patient were compared with FB plans using dosimetric parameters. RESULTS: All patients were successfully treated with the DIBH technique using Abches. Significant differences were found between the DIBH and FB plans for mean heart dose (2.52 vs. 4.53 Gy), heart V30 (16.48 vs. 45.13 cm(3)), V20 (21.35 vs. 54.55 cm(3)), mean left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) dose (16.01 vs. 26.26 Gy, all p < 0.001), and maximal dose to 0.2 cm(3) of the LAD (41.65 vs. 47.27 Gy, p = 0.017). The mean left lung dose (7.53 vs. 8.03 Gy, p = 0.073) and lung V20 (14.63% vs. 15.72%, p = 0.060) of DIBH using Abches were not different significantly compared with FB. CONCLUSION: We report that the use of a DIBH technique using Abches in breathing adapted radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer is easily feasible in daily practice and significantly reduces the radiation doses to the heart and LAD, therefore potentially reducing cardiac risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Left-sided breast cancer (n=25). Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) using Abches vs. Free breathing (FB) was evaluated on Mean heart dose (p=<0.001). The deep inspiration breath hold technique using Abches significantly reduced the mean heart dose (2.52 vs. 4.53 Gy, p < 0.001) compared to free breathing in patients undergoing left-sided breast irradiation.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: