Key result
Higher lean body mass index was associated with a lower risk of 1-year all-cause mortality among heart failure patients, with the highest quartile having a hazard ratio of 0.61 compared to the lowest quartile.
Why the study?
Although body mass index has an unexplained inverse or U-shaped relationship with heart failure mortality, little is known about the independent effects of lean body mass and fat mass.
Does higher lean body mass index or fat mass index improve 1-year mortality in patients hospitalized with heart failure?
Cohort (n=4,305)
Yes
Does higher lean body mass index or fat mass index improve 1-year mortality in patients hospitalized with heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 0.61 (95% CI 0.45–0.82)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.8% vs 24.6%
p-value: p=<0.01
Higher lean body mass, but not fat mass, is independently associated with lower 1-year mortality in patients hospitalized for heart failure, suggesting that muscle mass may drive the observed 'obesity paradox'.
Background Prior studies have found an unexplained inverse or U-shaped relationship between body mass index (BMI) and mortality in heart failure (HF) patients. However, little is known about the independent effects of each body component, i.e., lean body mass (LBM) and fat mass (FM), on mortality. Methods We used data from the China Patient-centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events-Prospective Heart Failure Study. LBM and FM were calculated using equations developed from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. LBM and FM index, calculated by dividing LBM or FM in kilograms by the square of height in meters, were used for analysis. We used restricted cubic spline and Cox model to examine the association of LBM and FM index with 1-year all-cause mortality. Results Among 4,305 patients, median (interquartile range) age was 67 (57–76) years, 37.7% were women. During the 1-year follow-up, 691 (16.1%) patients died. After adjustments, LBM index was inversely associated with mortality in a linear way ( P -overall association < 0.01; P -non-linearity = 0.52), but no association between FM index and mortality was observed ( P -overall association = 0.19). Compared with patients in the 1st quartile of the LBM index, those in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles had lower risk of death, with hazard ratio of 0.80 (95% CI 0.66–0.97), 0.65 (95% CI 0.52–0.83), and 0.61 (95% CI 0.45–0.82), respectively. In contrast, this association was not observed between FM index quartiles and mortality. Conclusion Higher LBM, not FM, was associated with lower 1-year mortality among HF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ge et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Heart Failure (n=4,305). Lean body mass index (highest quartile) vs. Lean body mass index (lowest quartile) was evaluated on 1-year all-cause mortality (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.82, p=<0.01). Higher lean body mass index was associated with a lower risk of 1-year all-cause mortality among heart failure patients, with the highest quartile having a hazard ratio of 0.61 compared to the lowest quartile.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: