Key result
Resumption of warfarin after gastrointestinal bleeding significantly reduced thromboembolic events (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.88) and mortality without significantly increasing recurrent bleeding.
Why the study?
Does resumption of warfarin reduce thromboembolic events and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism who experience gastrointestinal bleeding?
Meta-Analysis
Does resumption of warfarin reduce thromboembolic events and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism who experience gastrointestinal bleeding?
Hazard Ratio: 0.68 (95% CI 0.52–0.88)
p-value: p=<0.004
Resuming warfarin after a gastrointestinal bleed in patients on long-term anticoagulation is associated with reduced thromboembolic events and mortality without a statistically significant increase in recurrent bleeding.
Supports resuming warfarin after gastrointestinal bleeding in eligible patients; confirms net clinical benefit in Level 1 meta-analysis of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism.
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding commonly complicates anticoagulant therapy. We aimed to systematically review the published literature to determine the risk of thromboembolism, recurrent GI bleeding and mortality for patients on long-term anticoagulation who experience GI bleeding based on whether anticoagulation therapy was resumed. We performed a systematic review of phase III randomised controlled trials and cohort studies in patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism who received oral anticoagulant. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL (from 1996-July 2014), conferences abstracts (from January 2006-July 2014) and www.clinicaltrials.gov (up to the last week of July 2014) with no language restriction. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction and study quality assessment. A total of three studies were included in the meta-analysis. The resumption of warfarin was associated with a significant reduction in thromboembolic events (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52 to 0.88, p<0.004, I(²)=82%). There was an increase in recurrent GI bleeding but not statistically significant for patients who restarted warfarin compared to those who did not (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.48, p = 0.10, I(²) = 0%). Resumption of warfarin was associated with significant reduction in mortality (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.88, p<0.001, I(²) = 87%). This meta-analysis demonstrates that resumption of warfarin following interruption due to GI bleeding is associated with a reduction in thromboembolic events and mortality without a statistically significant increase in recurrent GI bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chai‐Adisaksopha et al. (2015) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism with gastrointestinal bleeding. Resumption of warfarin vs. No resumption of warfarin was evaluated on Thromboembolic events (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.88, p=<0.004). Resumption of warfarin after gastrointestinal bleeding significantly reduced thromboembolic events (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.88) and mortality without significantly increasing recurrent bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: