Key result
Circulating neprilysin levels were not associated with overall survival in an unselected cohort of treatment-naïve cancer patients (adjusted HR 1.00).
Why the study?
Neprilysin is implicated in cardiovascular disease and tumor biology, but its relationship with established cardiovascular biomarkers and effect on overall survival in treatment-naïve cancer patients remained to be investigated.
Does circulating neprilysin predict all-cause mortality in treatment-naïve cancer patients?
Cohort (n=555)
No
Does circulating neprilysin predict all-cause mortality in treatment-naïve cancer patients?
Hazard Ratio: 1 (95% CI 0.94–1.06)
p-value: p=0.887
Circulating neprilysin lacks association with overall survival and established cardiovascular biomarkers in treatment-naïve cancer patients, limiting its potential as a cardio-oncology biomarker.
cNEP may aid prognostication in untreated cancer; leaves open incremental value over established biomarkers.
The transmembrane zink-metalloendopeptidase neprilysin (NEP) is implicated in cardiovascular disease but also tumor biology. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship of circulating NEP (cNEP) levels with established cardiovascular biomarkers and its effect on overall survival in an unselected cohort of treatment-naïve cancer patients. 555 consecutive cancer patients prior anticancer therapy were enrolled prospectively. NEP levels were determined alongside routine laboratory parameters, established cardiac biomarkers, i.e. NT-proBNP, hsTnT, MR-proANP, MR-proADM, CT-proET-1 and Copeptin, and inflammatory parameters, i.e. CRP, IL-6 and SAA, in venous plasma samples. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. cNEP levels of 276 pg/ml (IQR: 0-5981) displayed a weak inverse correlation with age [r = -0.12, p = 0.023] and inflammatory status [r = -0.14, p = 0.007 CRP; r = -0.20, p < 0.001 IL-6 and r = -0.18, p < 0.001 SAA]. cNEP was comparable between different tumor entities and stages and not related to functional parameters of other organ systems as kidney, liver or especially the heart. Moreover, cNEP was not associated with overall survival in the total cohort [adj.HR for ln (cNEP) 1.00, 95% CI: 0.94-1.06, p = 0.887] but in myelodysplatic malignancies [adj.HR for ln (cNEP) 1.27, 95% CI: 1.01-1.61, p = 0.044]. In conclusion, cNEP lacks association with outcome but for myelodysplastic disease. cNEP shows no correlation with established cardiovascular biomarkers related to prognosis, thereby holding a limited potential as a biomarker in cardio-oncology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pávó et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Treatment-naïve cancer (n=555). Circulating neprilysin (cNEP) levels vs. Lower cNEP levels was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94-1.06, p=0.887). Circulating neprilysin levels were not associated with overall survival in an unselected cohort of treatment-naïve cancer patients (adjusted HR 1.00).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: