Key result
Serum concentrations of soluble neprilysin were significantly reduced by 47% in patients with HFrEF compared to healthy controls (1038 vs 1947 pg/ml, p < 0.05).
Why the study?
The diagnostic performance of sNEP in routine ambulatory care of HFrEF remained unclear, and its levels had not been compared with controls.
Are serum levels of soluble neprilysin altered in patients with HFrEF compared to healthy controls?
Observational (n=24)
No
Are serum levels of soluble neprilysin altered in patients with HFrEF compared to healthy controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 1038% vs 1947%
p-value: p=<0.05
Soluble neprilysin levels are significantly reduced in HFrEF patients compared to healthy controls and do not correlate with LVEF or NT-proBNP, questioning its utility as a diagnostic biomarker.
May guide sNEP biomarker research in HFrEF; leaves open prognostic utility pending validation.
OBJECTIVE: In addition to the recent success of neprilysin inhibition in treatment of heart failure, elevated soluble neprilysin (sNEP) in circulation has been suggested to be a prognostic biomarker in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the diagnostic performance of sNEP is nebulous and its levels in HFrEF have not been compared with controls. For the purpose of this study, we determined the role of sNEP levels as a biomarker in routine ambulatory care of HFrEF patients, when compared to the control subjects. METHODS: Ambulant patients with chronic HFrEF (n = 18) were included. Apparently healthy volunteers - hospital physicians (n = 9) were included as the controls. Besides standard diagnostic tools (echocardiographic examination and laboratory biochemical diagnostic tests including NT-proBNP assessment), we analysed serum levels of neprilysin with a commercially available human soluble neprilysin ultrasensitive ELISA kit (Aviscera Bioscience, USA). RESULTS: Concentrations of sNEP were significantly reduced in HFrEF patients (average ± S.E.M.=1038 ± 464 pg/ml) when compared to the controls (1947 ± 613 pg/ml; p < 0.05). Two of eighteen HFrEF samples were below, while two of ten control samples were above the detection limit of the immunoassay. We documented a lack of significant correlation between sNEP and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and other echocardiographic features as well as NT-proBNP. However, sNEP significantly negatively correlated to serum natrium levels (Spearman r = ‒0.6112, p < 0.05) and to systolic blood pressure (Spearman r = ‒0.4746, p < 0.05) in HFrEF. CONCLUSION: Levels of sNEP were significantly reduced in HFrEF, when compared to the controls, with absent correlations to relevant HF-related features (e.g. LVEF). These findings might contribute to clarification of the diagnostic value of sNEP in HF (Tab. 2, Fig. 2, Ref. 30)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nemcekova et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=24). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) vs. Healthy volunteers was evaluated on Serum levels of soluble neprilysin (sNEP) (p=<0.05). Serum concentrations of soluble neprilysin were significantly reduced by 47% in patients with HFrEF compared to healthy controls (1038 vs 1947 pg/ml, p < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: