Key result
A fully wearable and wireless sensorized belt yielded cardio-respiratory monitoring performances comparable to those of a spirometer and a two-lead ECG.
Why the study?
Despite existing devices, simple, low-cost, and easily applicable solutions for unobtrusive and continuous vital sign monitoring in home and sports environments are still needed.
Does a wearable sensorized belt with textile electrodes provide comparable cardio-respiratory monitoring to standard spirometry and ECG?
Does a wearable sensorized belt with textile electrodes provide comparable cardio-respiratory monitoring to standard spirometry and ECG?
A low-cost, wireless wearable belt with textile electrodes can simultaneously monitor ECG and respiratory rates with performance comparable to standard clinical devices.
May facilitate home and sports vital-signs monitoring; leaves open larger validation trials before clinical adoption.
Unobtrusive and continuous monitoring of vital signs is becoming more and more important both for patient monitoring in the home environment and for sports activity tracking. Even though many gadgets and clinical systems exist, the need for simple, low-cost and easily applicable solutions still remains, especially in view of a more widespread use within everyone's reach. The paper presents a fully wearable and wireless sensorized belt, suitable to simultaneously acquire respiratory and cardiac signals employing a single acquisition channel. The adopted method relies on a 50-kHz current injected in the subject thorax through a couple of textile electrodes and on envelope detection of the trans-thoracic voltage acquired from a couple of different embedded electrodes. The resulting signal contains both the baseband electrocardiogram (ECG) signal and the trans-thoracic impedance signal, which encodes respiratory acts. The two signals can be easily separated through suitable filtering and the cardio-respiratory rates extracted. The proposed solution yields performances comparable to those of a spirometer and a two-lead ECG. The whole system, with a realization cost below 100 €, a wireless interface, and several hours (or even days) of autonomy, is a suitable candidate for everyday use, especially if complemented by motion artifact removal techniques, currently under implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piuzzi et al. (2020) studied this question. Wearable belt with built-in textile electrodes vs. Spirometer and two-lead ECG was evaluated on Cardio-respiratory rates extraction. A fully wearable and wireless sensorized belt yielded cardio-respiratory monitoring performances comparable to those of a spirometer and a two-lead ECG.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: