Key result
Among 3,620 scheduled elective surgeries, 8.8% were cancelled (primarily due to patient absence) and 7.0% were added to the operating program.
Why the study?
Changes to the operative program cause inefficient use of operating ranges and waste resources, prompting an evaluation of their incidence, causes, and consequences.
Observational (n=3,620)
No
Changes in the operating program are frequent, with an 8.8% cancellation rate primarily driven by patient-related factors such as absence on the day of surgery.
Schedule disruptions waste OR resources; leaves open optimal coordination strategies before practice change.
Introduction: The changes of the operative program lead to inefficient use of available operating ranges, and waste of resources. Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the incidence, causes in the changes of the operating program and any consequences in order to find appropriate solutions for better patient management. Materials and Methods: It was of a study conducted in the potential services of anesthesiology of the Mohammed V military hospital in Rabat. Was included in the study changes the operating program (refusal, addition). Were excluded all the changes in the other operating sites. For any changes was completed farm return. The collected parameters were: age, sex, ASA, categories, the service concerns by adaptations, causes, the timing of the change and patient’s outcomes. Results: From November 2020 to May 2021; 3620 were scheduled for elective surgical operations. Of these, 320 (8, 8 %) patient’s operations were cancelled and 252 (7%) were added. The Urology department had the highest rate of cancellations (23, 4%). Causes related to patients represented 50 % of cancellation’s rate, followed by causes related to the surgery 40% and finally those related to anesthesia in 10% of all cancellations. The absence of the patient during the intervention was the most common patient-related reason for cancellation (78.1 %), the most common surgery reason was not a sufficient time frame (55.5 %) and finally the non-availability of blood and up ICU (25% each), were those related to anesthesia. Conclusion: Changes in the operating program rate were high in comparison with reported rate worldwide. Efforts should be made for planning, programming and coordination between the different actors involved in the operational planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meskine et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Scheduled for elective surgical operations (n=3,620). Changes in the operating program (cancellations and additions) was evaluated on Incidence of cancelled operations. Among 3,620 scheduled elective surgeries, 8.8% were cancelled (primarily due to patient absence) and 7.0% were added to the operating program.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: