This letter develops a systematic approach to quantitatively evaluate and compare LiFePO4battery cycle life improvement using ultracapacitors (UCs). The impact of UC sizing on temperature rise, capacity loss, and power fade under a real dynamic load profile is included for a comprehensive discussion and evaluation. It is found that the cycle-related battery capacity losses are reduced by 28.6% (C/3) and 29.0% (1C) using the optimized number of UCs, while the reductions are 36.3% (C/3) and 39.3% (1C) assuming an infinite number of UCs. The reductions on the power fade are 23.6% and 57.3% for the cases with optimized and infinite numbers of UCs, respectively. The reductions on temperature rise, 1.38 °C and 1.93 °C, in the two cases are also observed when discharging from 80% to 30% state of charge in one test cycle. The developed approach in the letter could serve as a general procedure to evaluate the cycle life improvement for other types of batteries when combined with UCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: