Key result
GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced the risk of stroke by 15% compared with placebo in patients with and without diabetes.
Why the study?
GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus, but their efficacy on cerebrovascular events across patients with and without diabetes is not well established.
Do GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce the risk of stroke in patients with and without diabetes?
Meta-Analysis (n=85,373)
Do GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce the risk of stroke in patients with and without diabetes?
GLP-1 receptor agonists significantly reduce the risk of overall and nonfatal stroke in patients with and without diabetes, without increasing stroke-related adverse events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
GLP-1RAs reduce stroke risk regardless of diabetes status; extends prior evidence to non-diabetic populations.
Central Illustration: Efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for prevention of stroke among patients with and without diabetes: a meta-analysis with the SELECT and FLOW trails. • GLP-1 receptor agonists have shown cardioprotective effects in previous meta -analyses among diabetic patients. • This present meta analysis has the novelty of including most recently published randomized trials such as FLOW, and SELECT trials and patients with a wide spectrum of disease evaluating risk of stroke and adverse events related to stroke. • GLP-1 receptor agonists has beneficial effects in reducing the risk of stroke, and nonfatal stroke in patients with and without diabetes. • Adverse events related to stroke were comparable, and risk of cerebrovascular accident was lower among GLP-1 receptor agonists group of patients. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have shown a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, its efficacy on cerebrovascular events is yet to be well established among diabetic and non diabetic patients. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of GLP-1 RAs on stroke risk among its different types in patients with and without Diabetes. We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inspection until 15th July 2024, without any language restrictions. Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a random-effect model, and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 11 RCTs with 85,373 patients were included (43,339 in GLP-1 RA and 42,034 in the placebo group) in the analysis. The mean age of the patients in GLP-1 RAs and the placebo groups was 63.5 and 63.1 years, respectively. Pooled analysis of primary and secondary endpoints showed that GLP-1 RAs significantly reduced the risk of incidence of stroke by 15 % (OR, 0.85(95 %CI: 0.77–0.93), P < 0.001) and nonfatal stroke by 13 % (OR, 0.87(95 %CI: 0.79–0.95), P < 0.001) compared with placebo. However, the risk of fatal stroke (OR, 0.94(95 %CI: 0.75–1.17), P = 0.56) was comparable between both groups of patients. Similarly, the risk of serious adverse events such as cerebrovascular accident (OR, 0.75(95 %CI: 0.57–1.00), P = 0.05), hemorrhagic stroke (OR, 0.82(95 %CI: 0.42–1.60), P = 0.57, and ischemic stroke (OR, 0.85(95 %CI: 0.64–1.13), P = 0.26) was comparable between GLP-1RAs and placebo. Treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists has beneficial effects in reducing the risk of stroke, and nonfatal stroke in patients with and without diabetes. However, no such effect was observed for fatal stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gera et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Patients with and without diabetes (n=85,373). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) vs. Placebo was evaluated on Incidence of stroke (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77 - 0.93, p=< 0.001). GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced the risk of stroke by 15% compared with placebo in patients with and without diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: