Key result
The Korean version of the Suboptimal Health Status Questionnaire-25 demonstrated excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability, proving to be a valid tool.
Why the study?
Although the Suboptimal Health Status Questionnaire-25 (SHSQ-25) is validated across major populations as a reliable tool to assess suboptimal health status, a Korean version had not yet been developed and validated.
Cross-Sectional (n=460)
No
The Korean version of the Suboptimal Health Status Questionnaire-25 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing suboptimal health status in the Korean population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
K-SHSQ-25 enables SHS assessment in Koreans; extends validation to a new population but leaves open prospective outcome studies.
Background: Suboptimal health status (SHS) is a reversible stage between health and illness that is characterized by health complaints, low energy, general weakness, and chronic fatigue. The Suboptimal Health Status Questionnaire-25 (SHSQ-25) has been validated in three major populations (African, Asian, and Caucasian) and is internationally recognized as a reliable and robust tool for health estimation in general populations. This study focused on the development of K-SHSQ-25, a Korean version of the SHSQ-25, from its English version. Methods: The SHSQ-25 was translated from English to Korean according to international guidelines set forth by the World Health Organization (WHO) for health instrument translation between different languages. A subsequent cross-sectional survey involved 460 healthy South Korean participants (aged 18-83 years; 65.4% females) to answer the 25 questions focusing on the health perspectives of 5 domains, 1) fatigue, 2) cardiovascular health, 3) digestive tract, 4) immune system and 5) mental health. The K-SHSQ-25 was further validated using tests for reliability, internal consistency, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: The version of K-SHSQ-25 achieved linguistic, cultural, and conceptual equivalence to the English version. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of test-retest reliability for individual items ranged from 0.88 to 0.99. Reliability estimates based on internal consistency reached a Cronbach's α of 0.953; the Cronbach's α for each domain ranged from 0.76 to 0.94. Regarding construct validity, the EFA of the K-SHSQ-25 generally replicated the multidimensional structure (fatigue, cardiovascular, digestive, immune system, and mental health) and 25 questions. The CFA revealed that the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), goodness-of-fit index (GFI) and adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) were excellent (RMSEA = 0.069<0.08, GFI = 0.929>0.90, AGFI = 0.907>0.90). The five domains of the K-SHSQ-25 showed significant correlations with each other (r = 0.59-0.81, P<0.001). The cut-off point of K-SHSQ-25 for SHS was determined as an SHS score of 25. The prevalence of SHS in this study was 60.0% (276/460), with 47.8% (76/159) for males and 58.5% for females (176/301). Conclusions: Our results indicate that the Korean version of SHSQ-25, K-SHSQ-25, is a transcultural equivalent, robust, valid, and reliable assessment tool for evaluating SHS in the Korean-speaking population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Suboptimal Health Status (n=460). Korean version of the Suboptimal Health Status Questionnaire-25 (K-SHSQ-25) was evaluated on Test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient) (ICC 0.95, 95% CI 0.88-0.99). The Korean version of the Suboptimal Health Status Questionnaire-25 demonstrated excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability, proving to be a valid tool.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: