Key result
The presented Bayesian active learning method significantly improved the accuracy of estimating the posterior probability density function of cardiac model parameters compared to regular Bayesian active learning (p<0.001), while reducing computational cost by 99.65% compared to direct MCMC sampling.
Why the study?
Direct MCMC sampling for cardiac electrophysiological model parameters is computationally intensive, while efficient surrogate models suffer from limited accuracy.
A novel Bayesian active learning method improves accuracy and reduces computational cost for parameter estimation in cardiac electrophysiological models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Surrogate models make posterior sampling feasible in cardiac EP; leaves open validation for clinical model personalization.
Probabilistic estimation of cardiac electrophysiological model parameters serves an important step towards model personalization and uncertain quantification. The expensive computation associated with these model simulations, however, makes direct Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling of the posterior probability density function (pdf) of model parameters computationally intensive. Approximated posterior pdfs resulting from replacing the simulation model with a computationally efficient surrogate, on the other hand, have seen limited accuracy. In this paper, we present a Bayesian active learning method to directly approximate the posterior pdf function of cardiac model parameters, in which we intelligently select training points to query the simulation model in order to learn the posterior pdf using a small number of samples. We integrate a generative model into Bayesian active learning to allow approximating posterior pdf of high-dimensional model parameters at the resolution of the cardiac mesh. We further introduce new acquisition functions to focus the selection of training points on better approximating the shape rather than the modes of the posterior pdf of interest. We evaluated the presented method in estimating tissue excitability in a 3D cardiac electrophysiological model in a range of synthetic and real-data experiments. We demonstrated its improved accuracy in approximating the posterior pdf compared to Bayesian active learning using regular acquisition functions, and substantially reduced computational cost in comparison to existing standard or accelerated MCMC sampling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaman et al. (2021) studied Myocardial infarction (computational modeling) (n=9). Bayesian active learning with generative modeling and posterior-focused acquisition functions vs. Regular Bayesian active learning and Two-stage MCMC was evaluated on Accuracy (KL divergence) and computational cost of estimated posterior probability density function (p=<0.001). The presented Bayesian active learning method significantly improved the accuracy of estimating the posterior probability density function of cardiac model parameters compared to regular Bayesian active learning (p<0.001), while reducing computational cost by 99.65% compared to direct MCMC sampling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: