Key result
Percutaneous mitral valve repair using the PASCAL system achieved a 90% technical success rate, with 97% of patients maintaining MR grade ≤ 2 at a mean follow-up of 8.7 months.
Why the study?
Short and mid-term safety and efficacy of the PASCAL system for percutaneous mitral valve repair in an all-comer population with severe mitral regurgitation needed investigation.
Does percutaneous mitral valve repair using the PASCAL system improve mitral regurgitation and functional class in an all-comer population with severe MR?
Cohort (n=41)
No
Does percutaneous mitral valve repair using the PASCAL system improve mitral regurgitation and functional class in an all-comer population with severe MR?
The PASCAL system for percutaneous mitral valve repair is feasible and safe in a real-world population, providing significant mid-term reduction in mitral regurgitation and clinical improvement.
Supports feasibility of PASCAL in severe MR; leaves open durability and randomized comparisons.
AIMS: We investigated short and mid-term safety and efficacy of the PASCAL system for percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVr) in severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in an all-comer population. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the first consecutive 41 patients undergoing PMVr using the PASCAL system in our centre, procedural success and safety were assessed. Efficacy in improving MR and functional class were evaluated. Median patient age was 74 years, 58.5% were male patients, and median European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation Score II was 5.1%. All patients suffered from severe MR with 59% functional MR, 29% degenerative MR, and 12% of mixed aetiology MR. The technical success rate was 90%, limited by four cases where PASCAL implantation was aborted due to a prohibitive mitral gradient. On average, 1.16 PASCAL devices per patient were implanted. All patients successfully implanted with a PASCAL device were discharged with MR grade ≤ 2 and 79% with MR grade ≤ 1. Mean follow-up was 8.7 ± 4.9 months. Ninety-seven per cent of patients remained at MR ≤ 2 at follow-up, which translated into a significantly improved New York Heart Association functional class as well as a significant reduction of systolic pulmonary artery pressure and brain natriuretic peptide levels. The procedure-related rate for major adverse events was 3%. Neither early nor late single-leaflet detachment was found. In one patient, air embolism occurred, resulting in modification of the PASCAL instructions for use. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous mitral valve repair using PASCAL in a real-world, all-comer population was feasible and safe, resulting in a significant mid-term reduction of MR with persistent clinical improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schlegel et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Severe mitral regurgitation (n=41). PASCAL system for percutaneous mitral valve repair was evaluated on Technical success rate. Percutaneous mitral valve repair using the PASCAL system achieved a 90% technical success rate, with 97% of patients maintaining MR grade ≤ 2 at a mean follow-up of 8.7 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: