Why the study?
The influence of pre-intervention coronary physiologic status on outcomes following PCI is not well known.
Does pre- and post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) predict target vessel failure in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cohort (n=1,479)
Yes
Does pre- and post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) predict target vessel failure in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Hazard Ratio: 1.82 (95% CI 1.15–2.87)
Absolute Event Rate: 7.8% vs 4.2%
p-value: p=0.011
Pre-PCI FFR provides important prognostic information after PCI, and the prognostic value of post-PCI FFR is most significant in patients with a low pre-PCI FFR.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The influence of pre-intervention coronary physiologic status on outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well known. We sought to investigate the prognostic implications of pre-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) combined with post-PCI FFR. METHODS: A total of 1,479 PCI patients with pre-and post-PCI FFR data were analyzed. The patients were classified according to the median values of pre-PCI FFR (0.71) and post-PCI FFR (0.88). The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years. RESULTS: The risk of TVF was higher in the low pre-PCI FFR group than in the high pre-PCI FFR group (hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.87; p=0.011). In 4 group comparisons, the cumulative incidences of TVF at 2 years were 3.8%, 4.1%, 4.8%, and 10.2% in the high pre-/high post-, low pre-/high post-, high pre-/low post-, and low pre-/low post-PCI FFR groups, respectively. The risk of TVF was the highest in the low pre-/low post-PCI FFR group among the groups (p values for comparisons <0.05). In addition, the high pre-/low post-PCI FFR group presented a comparable risk of TVF with the high post-PCI FFR groups (p values for comparison >0.05). When the prognostic value of the post-PCI FFR was evaluated according to the pre-PCI FFR, the risk of TVF significantly decreased with an increase in post-PCI FFR in the low pre-PCI FFR group, but not in the high pre-PCI FFR group. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-PCI FFR was associated with clinical outcomes after PCI, and the prognostic value of post-PCI FFR differed according to the pre-PCI FFR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04012281.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (n=1,479). Low pre-PCI FFR (≤0.71) vs. High pre-PCI FFR (>0.71) was evaluated on Target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.15-2.87, p=0.011).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: