Key result
CYP2C19 intermediate and poor metabolizers taking citalopram had significantly longer QTc intervals than extensive metabolizers (440.1 vs 427.1 ms; p=0.029), with no dose-QTc correlation.
Why the study?
Does CYP2C19 phenotype, medication dose, or serum concentration affect QTc interval in patients taking citalopram or escitalopram?
Cohort (n=155)
Does CYP2C19 phenotype, medication dose, or serum concentration affect QTc interval in patients taking citalopram or escitalopram?
Absolute Event Rate: 440.1% vs 427.1%
p-value: p=0.029
CYP2C19 poor/intermediate metabolizer phenotype, rather than citalopram dose or serum level, is associated with QTc prolongation, suggesting a role for pharmacogenomic testing to guide therapy.
Recently, a FDA Safety Communication warned of a dose-dependent risk for QTc prolongation with citalopram, which is metabolized by CYP2C19 of the cytochrome P450 system. We investigate associations between citalopram and escitalopram dose, serum concentration, CYP2C19 phenotype, and QTc. We undertook a retrospective chart review of citalopram or escitalopram patients with the inclusion criteria of consistent medication dose, CYP2C19 phenotype (extensive metabolizers [EM], intermediate metabolizers [IM], poor metabolizers [PM]), and QTc interval on ECG. We further identified 42 citalopram users with citalopram serum concentration measurements and ECG. Regression and one-way ANOVA were used to examine the relationship between citalopram dose, citalopram serum concentration, CYP2C19 phenotype, and QTc interval. Of 75 citalopram patients, the EM group had significantly shorter QTc intervals than a combined IM+PM group (427.1±23.6 ms vs. 440.1±26.6 ms, one-tailed t-test, p=0.029). In the 80 escitalopram cohort, there was no significant difference in QTc between phenotype groups. There was no statistical correlation between citalopram (p=0.62) or escitalopram (p=0.30) dose and QTc. QTc was not associated with citalopram serum level (p=0.45). In contrast to the FDA warning, this study found no association between citalopram/escitalopram dose and QTc. However, PM of the drug tended to have longer QTc intervals. Our findings suggest cytochrome P450 genotyping in select patients may be helpful to guide medication optimization while limiting harmful effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Patients taking citalopram or escitalopram (n=155). CYP2C19 intermediate or poor metabolizer phenotype vs. CYP2C19 extensive metabolizer phenotype was evaluated on QTc interval (p=0.029). CYP2C19 intermediate and poor metabolizers taking citalopram had significantly longer QTc intervals than extensive metabolizers (440.1 vs 427.1 ms; p=0.029), with no dose-QTc correlation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: