Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan cuts CV death or HF rehospitalization ~42% vs enalapril across ADHF subgroups.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether potentially high-risk subpopulations stabilized during hospitalization for acute decompensated HF share the same risk-benefit profile from initiating sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril.
Does in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril consistently reduce cardiovascular death or heart failure rehospitalization without increasing safety risks across high-risk subgroups of patients stabilized during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure?
RCT (n=881)
Double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril consistently reduce cardiovascular death or heart failure rehospitalization without increasing safety risks across high-risk subgroups of patients stabilized during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure?
In-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan after stabilization for acute decompensated HFrEF provides consistent reductions in cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization without excess renal, hypotensive, or hyperkalemic risk even in high-risk patient subgroups.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports in-hospital sacubitril/valsartan initiation in high-risk stabilized ADHF; confirms consistent benefit and safety across subgroups.
Background: In patients stabilized during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (HF), initiation of sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril decreased the risk of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF without increasing the risk of adverse events. It is unknown whether potentially high-risk subpopulations have a similar risk-benefit profile. Methods: PIONEER-HF (Comparison of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Effect on NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide] in Patients Stabilized From an Acute HF Episode) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan (n=440) versus enalapril (n=441) in patients stabilized during hospitalization for acute decompensated HF. The composite of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF was adjudicated. Safety outcomes included worsening renal function, symptomatic hypotension, and hyperkalemia. We evaluated heterogeneity in the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on these efficacy and safety outcomes in selected subgroups of clinical concern: patients with baseline systolic blood pressure ≤118 mm Hg (median; n=448), baseline NT-proBNP >2701 pg/mL (median; n=395), estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/minute per 1.73 m 2 (n=455), ≥1 additional hospitalization for HF within the prior year (n=343), admission to the ICU during the index hospitalization (n=96), inotrope use during the index hospitalization (n=68), and severe congestion (n=219). Results: The relative risk reduction in cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF with sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril was consistent across all high-risk subgroups ( P interaction=non-significant [NS] for each). The risks of worsening renal function, symptomatic hypotension, and hyperkalemia with sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril were also consistent in each high- versus low-risk subgroup ( P interaction=NS for each). Conclusions: In high-risk subpopulations admitted for acute decompensated HF, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan after initial stabilization conferred a consistent reduction in cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF and was well tolerated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berg et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) stabilized during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) (n=881). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Enalapril was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.87). Sacubitril/valsartan reduced cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization vs enalapril (overall HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.87) consistently across all high-risk ADHF subgroups (P interaction=NS).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: