Key result
Parallel RF excitation significantly mitigated B1+ inhomogeneity at 7 Tesla, reducing the standard deviation of the in-plane flip angle to 7.6% compared to 16.7% for conventional sinc excitation.
Parallel RF excitation significantly mitigates B1+ inhomogeneity at 7 Tesla, providing spatially uniform flip angles with only a small pulse-duration penalty compared to conventional methods.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enable uniform 7T cardiac MRI; extends parallel RF methods but leaves clinical adoption open.
Slice-selective RF waveforms that mitigate severe B1+ inhomogeneity at 7 Tesla using parallel excitation were designed and validated in a water phantom and human studies on six subjects using a 16-element degenerate stripline array coil driven with a butler matrix to utilize the eight most favorable birdcage modes. The parallel RF waveform design applied magnitude least-squares (MLS) criteria with an optimized k-space excitation trajectory to significantly improve profile uniformity compared to conventional least-squares (LS) designs. Parallel excitation RF pulses designed to excite a uniform in-plane flip angle (FA) with slice selection in the z-direction were demonstrated and compared with conventional sinc-pulse excitation and RF shimming. In all cases, the parallel RF excitation significantly mitigated the effects of inhomogeneous B1+ on the excitation FA. The optimized parallel RF pulses for human B1+ mitigation were only 67% longer than a conventional sinc-based excitation, but significantly outperformed RF shimming. For example the standard deviations (SDs) of the in-plane FA (averaged over six human studies) were 16.7% for conventional sinc excitation, 13.3% for RF shimming, and 7.6% for parallel excitation. This work demonstrates that excitations with parallel RF systems can provide slice selection with spatially uniform FAs at high field strengths with only a small pulse-duration penalty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Setsompop et al. (2008) studied this question. Parallel RF excitation with magnitude least-squares (MLS) criteria vs. Conventional sinc-pulse excitation and RF shimming was evaluated on Standard deviation of the in-plane flip angle (FA). Parallel RF excitation significantly mitigated B1+ inhomogeneity at 7 Tesla, reducing the standard deviation of the in-plane flip angle to 7.6% compared to 16.7% for conventional sinc excitation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: