Key result
Clinical-grade CTA and CMR provided highly correlated assessments of cardiac diameters (r=0.9; 95% CI 0.8-0.9; P<0.0001) and volumes in rabbits.
Why the study?
Non-invasive CT- and MR-based cardiac imaging remains challenging in rodents, prompting investigation into multimodality imaging robustness in rabbits using clinical-grade scanners.
Observational (n=16)
Multimodality non-invasive assessment of cardiac function using clinical-grade MR and CT scanners is feasible and robust in rabbit models, enabling serial cardiac assessment for preclinical disease monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rabbit cardiac imaging feasible with clinical scanners; leaves open translation to rodents or humans.
BACKGROUND: Non-invasive computer tomography (CT)- and magnetic resonance (MR)-based cardiac imaging still remains challenging in rodents. To investigate the robustness of non-invasive multimodality cardiac imaging in rabbits using clinical-grade CT and MR scanners. METHODS: A total of 16 rabbits (2.7-4.0 kg) serially underwent cardiac-gated imaging using a clinical-grade 256-row CT and a 1.5 Tesla MR-scanner at baseline and at 4-month follow-up (16±1 weeks). Image analysis included image quality (5-grade scale), left ventricular (LV) volumes, LV stroke volume, LV diameters, LV wall thickness and ejection fraction (LVEF). RESULTS: CTA 78%, P=0.68). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a good correlation of all diameters (diam.) and volumes (vol.) as assessed by CTA and CMR (diam.: r=0.9, 95% CI: 0.8-0.9; vol.: r=0.8, 95% CI: 0.6-0.9; P<0.0001 for both). CTA-based volumetric analysis revealed slightly higher LVEF values as compared to CMR (CTA: 64%±1%, CMR: 59%±1%, P=0.002). Analysis of inter-/intra-observer agreement demonstrated excellent agreements for diameters (CMR: 98.5%/98.7%; CTA: 98.2%/97.4%) and volumes (CMR: 99.9%/98.8%; CTA 98.7%/98.7%). Finally, serial CMR- and CTA-based assessment of cardiac diameters and volumes delivered excellent intersession agreements of baseline versus follow-up data (diam.: CMR: r=0.89; CTA: r=0.92; vol.: CMR: r=0.87; CTA: r=0.96, P<0.0001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Multimodality non-invasive assessment of cardiac function and aortic hemodynamics is feasible and robust in rabbits using clinical-grade and MR and CT scanners. These imaging modalities could improve serial cardiac assessment for disease monitoring in preclinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gitsioudis et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Animal model (rabbits) (n=16). Clinical-grade 256-row CT (CTA) vs. 1.5 Tesla MR-scanner (CMR) was evaluated on Correlation of cardiac diameters (r=0.9, 95% CI 0.8-0.9, p=<0.0001). Clinical-grade CTA and CMR provided highly correlated assessments of cardiac diameters (r=0.9; 95% CI 0.8-0.9; P<0.0001) and volumes in rabbits.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: