Why the study?
Does catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation improve insulin sensitivity and blood pressure in nondiabetic patients with treatment-resistant hypertension?
Does catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation improve insulin sensitivity and blood pressure in nondiabetic patients with treatment-resistant hypertension?
Renal denervation significantly reduced blood pressure but did not significantly improve overall insulin sensitivity in a small cohort of nondiabetic patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, though leaner subjects may derive more metabolic benefit.
RDN may improve insulin sensitivity in some resistant hypertension patients; leaves open metabolic effects pending randomized confirmation.
Increased sympathetic activity is important in the pathogenesis of hypertension and insulin resistance. Afferent signaling from the kidneys elevates the central sympathetic drive. We investigated the effect of catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) on glucose metabolism, inflammatory markers, and blood pressure in nondiabetic patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. Eight subjects were included in an open-labelled study. Each patient was studied before and 6 months after RDN. Endogenous glucose production was assessed by a 3- 3 H glucose tracer, insulin sensitivity was examined by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp, hormones and inflammatory markers were analyzed, and blood pressure was measured by office blood pressure readings and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Insulin sensitivity (M-value) increased nonsignificantly from 2.68 ± 0.28 to 3.07 ± 0.41 (p=0.12). A significant inverse correlation between the increase inM-value and BMI 6 months after RDN (p=0.03) was found, suggesting beneficial effects on leaner subjects. Blood pressure decreased significantly, but there were no changes in hormones, inflammatory markers, or endogenous glucose production. Our results indicate that RDN may improve insulin sensitivity in some patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, albeit confirmation of these indications of beneficial effects on leaner subjects awaits the outcome of larger randomized controlled studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kampmann et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: