Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A figure of merit is defined for an indexing of a given pattern as M20 = Q20/2 20. Here N20 is the number of different calculated Q values up to Q20, which is the Q value for the 20th observed and indexed line; is the average discrepancy in Q for these 20 lines. From a number of indexings which have been disproved by single-crystal analysis, the conclusion is drawn that M20 < 6 must give rise to considerable doubt about the result. A number of confirmed indexings shows values of 20–60 for good routine work on pure, well crystallized samples, and down to 6 for retrievable correct indexings of less accurate data. If the number of unindexed lines below Q20 is not more than two, a value M20 > 10 guarantees that the indexing is substantially correct.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paweł Wolff (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: