This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Prospective data on the impact of CD34 + cell loss during cryopreservation and the amount of cryopreserved CD34 + cells infused after high‐dose therapy on hematologic recovery and post‐transplant outcome in multiple myeloma (MM) are scarce. Patients and methods This post‐hoc study aimed to investigate factors associating with CD34 + cell loss during cryopreservation and the effects of the infusion of a very low number (<1.0 × 10 6 /kg, group A), low number (1–1.9 × 10 6 /kg, group B), and optimal number (≥2 × 10 6 /kg, group C) of thawed viable CD34 + cells on hematologic recovery, progression free survival, and overall survival after autologous stem cell transplantation among 127 patients with MM. Results In group C, pegfilgrastim use ( P = 0.001), plerixafor use ( P = 0.039), and older age ≥ 60 years ( P = 0.026) were associated with less loss of CD34 + cells during cryopreservation. Better mobilization efficacy correlated with greater CD34 + cell loss in group B ( P = 0.013 and P = 0.001) and in group C ( P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Early platelet engraftment was slowest in group A (20 d vs 12 d in group B vs 11 d in group C, P = 0.003). The infused viable CD34 + cell count <1.0 × 10 6 /kg seemed not to have influence on PFS ( P = 0.322) or OS ( P = 0.378) in MM patients. Conclusions Cryopreservation impacts significantly on the CD34 + cell loss. A very low number of graft viable CD34 + cells did not affect PFS or OS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Partanen et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: