Why the study?
Racial disparities in hypertension prevalence and control persist, particularly among Black individuals in the rural, low-income US Southeast Black Belt region.
Does a structured recruitment approach improve recruitment and retention of primary care practices in a pragmatic implementation trial for blood pressure control?
Does a structured recruitment approach improve recruitment and retention of primary care practices in a pragmatic implementation trial for blood pressure control?
A structured approach to recruiting primary care practices in a pragmatic implementation trial resulted in successful enrollment of 69 practices with a high retention rate (97.1%).
Addresses hypertension control gaps in rural Black populations; extends pragmatic RCT evidence for multi-level interventions in priority settings.
Background: Racial disparities related to hypertension prevalence and control persist, with Black persons continuing to have both high prevalence and suboptimal control. The Black Belt region of the US Southeast is characterized by multiple critical priority populations: rural, low-income, and minority (Black). Methods: In a cluster-randomized, controlled, pragmatic implementation trial, the Southeastern Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Control evaluated two multi-component, multi-level functional interventions - peer coaching (PC) and practice facilitation (PF) (separately and combined) - as adjuncts to usual care to improve blood pressure control in the Black Belt. The overall goal was to randomize 80 primary care practices (later reduced to 69 practices) in Alabama and North Carolina to one of four interventions: 1) enhanced usual care (EUC); 2) EUC plus PC; 3) EUC plus PF; or 4) EUC plus both PC and PF. Several measures to facilitate recruitment and retention of practices were employed, including practice readiness assessment. Results: Contact was initiated with 248 practices during the study enrollment period. Of these, 99 declined participation, 39 were ineligible, and 41 were being evaluated for inclusion when the target number of practices was reached. The remaining 69 practices eventually were enrolled, with 18 practices randomized to EUC, 19 to PC, 16 to PF, and 16 to PC plus PF. Only two practices (2.9%) were withdrawn during the study. Several facilitators of and barriers to practice recruitment and retention were identified. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the importance of a structured approach to recruiting primary care practices in a pragmatic implementation trial.ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02866669.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shikany et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: