Why the study?
Does an automated system using higher order spectral analysis and support vector machine classification accurately identify cardiac health in subjects with various cardiac disease conditions?
Does an automated system using higher order spectral analysis and support vector machine classification accurately identify cardiac health in subjects with various cardiac disease conditions?
An automated system using higher order spectral analysis of heart rate variability and support vector machine classification can identify cardiac disease conditions with 90% sensitivity and 87.93% specificity.
May support automated cardiac screening development; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The Electrocardiogram (ECG) is an important bio-signal representing the sum total of millions of cardiac cell depolarization potentials. It contains important insight into the state of health and nature of the disease afflicting the heart. Heart rate variability (HRV) refers to the regulation of the sinoatrial node, the natural pacemaker of the heart by the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system. The HRV signal can be used as a base signal to observe the heart's functioning. These signals are non-linear and non-stationary in nature. So, higher order spectral (HOS) analysis, which is more suitable for non-linear systems and is robust to noise, was used. An automated intelligent system for the identification of cardiac health is very useful in healthcare technology. In this work, we have extracted seven features from the heart rate signals using HOS and fed them to a support vector machine (SVM) for classification. Our performance evaluation protocol uses 330 subjects consisting of five different kinds of cardiac disease conditions. We demonstrate a sensitivity of 90% for the classifier with a specificity of 87.93%. Our system is ready to run on larger data sets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chua Kuang Chua (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: