Antenatal betamethasone exposure attenuates the tubular Ang-(1-7)-Mas-NO pathway in male but not female sheep, indicating sex-specific fetal programming of renal sodium handling.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Antenatal Beta exposure may sex-specifically alter Ang-(1–7) Na+ and NO responses in sheep RPTC; leaves open human translational relevance.
We previously reported a sex-specific effect of antenatal treatment with betamethasone (Beta) on sodium (Na + ) excretion in adult sheep whereby treated males but not females had an attenuated natriuretic response to angiotensin-(1–7) [Ang-(1–7)]. The present study determined the Na + uptake and nitric oxide (NO) response to low-dose Ang-(1–7) (1 pM) in renal proximal tubule cells (RPTC) from adult male and female sheep antenatally exposed to Beta or vehicle. Data were expressed as percentage of basal uptake or area under the curve for Na + or percentage of control for NO. Male Beta RPTC exhibited greater Na + uptake than male vehicle cells (433 ± 28 vs. 330 ± 26%; P < 0.05); however, Beta exposure had no effect on Na + uptake in the female cells (255 ± 16 vs. 255 ± 14%; P > 0.05). Ang-(1–7) significantly inhibited Na + uptake in RPTC from vehicle male (214 ± 11%) and from both vehicle (190 ± 14%) and Beta (209 ± 11%) females but failed to attenuate Na + uptake in Beta male cells. Beta exposure also abolished stimulation of NO by Ang-(1–7) in male but not female RPTC. Both the Na + and NO responses to Ang-(1–7) were blocked by Mas receptor antagonist d-Ala 7 -Ang-(1–7). We conclude that the tubular Ang-(1–7)-Mas-NO pathway is attenuated in males and not females by antenatal Beta exposure. Moreover, since primary cultures of RPTC retain both the sex and Beta-induced phenotype of the adult kidney in vivo they appear to be an appropriate cell model to examine the effects of fetal programming on Na + handling by the renal tubules.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: