Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A survey was made of the chromosome numbers in the Magnoliales sensu lato. An extensive aneuploid series is present in this group. Polyploid series occur but do not dominate the chromosome-number pattern. Secondary aneuploidy at polyploid levels is common. No single basic number has a really widespread systematic distribution in primitive dicots. The most widespread basic numbers among 19 families of Magnoliales and seven primitive dicot families belonging to other orders are x = 8, 12, 14, and 19. In this group of 26 families, n = 7 is not particularly common and x = 7 is not widespread. The currently prevailing hypothesis that the original basic number of the dicots and of the angiosperms was x = 7 is not supported by the present survey but is not ruled out either. An ancestral x = 8 is an equally or more attractive possibility on the present evidence. The paleopolyploid hypothesis holds that the generally high basic numbers in woody dicots (n = 12 and upward) are old polyploid numbers. The chromosome-number pattern in primitive dicots indicates that this hypothesis is applicable mainly to the higher basic numbers (n = 18, 19, etc.). Ascending aneuploidy probably accounts for most cases of n = 12 and 13 and for many or most cases of n = 14 and 15 in primitive woody dicots.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verne Grant (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: