Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Based on the newly discovered Anhui University manuscript, the paper re-examines the controversy over the oral and written nature of the Classic of Poetry ’s early transmission. The paper argues that the Anda Shi jing serves to prove, first, that at the time of the manuscript (mid-Warring States period), or even earlier, the Shi jing was already not only an independent text, but had already been written down, and second, that the Anda Shi jing is a “manuscript,” and what is more there are various traces showing that it was a “copy,” such that it could not have been produced in an oral context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wen Jiang (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: