This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Goal:To evaluate the usability of different technologies designed for a remote assessment of knee osteoarthritis.Methods:We recruited eleven patients affected by mild or moderate knee osteoarthritis, eleven caregivers, and eleven clinicians to assess the following technologies: a wristband for monitoring physical activity, an examination chair for measuring leg extension, a thermal camera for acquiring skin thermographic data, a force balance for measuring center of pressure, an ultrasound imaging system for remote echographic acquisition, a mobile app, and a clinical portal software. Specific questionnaires scoring usability were filled out by patients, caregivers and clinicians.Results:The questionnaires highlighted a good level of usability and user-friendliness for all the technologies, obtaining an average score of 8.7 provided by the patients, 8.8 by the caregivers, and 8.5 by the clinicians, on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. Such average scores were calculated by putting together the scores obtained for the single technologies under evaluation and averaging them.Conclusions:This study demonstrates a high level of acceptability for the tested portable technologies designed for a potentially remote and frequent assessment of knee osteoarthritis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cafarelli et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: