Why the study?
Atrioesophageal fistula is a rare but devastating complication with high mortality post AF ablation, prompting study of its epidemiology, clinical features, pathogenesis, and management.
Does surgical repair improve survival compared to nonsurgical management in patients with atrioesophageal fistula post atrial fibrillation ablation?
Does surgical repair improve survival compared to nonsurgical management in patients with atrioesophageal fistula post atrial fibrillation ablation?
Atrioesophageal fistula is a rare but highly lethal complication of AF ablation, and urgent surgical repair is associated with significantly improved survival compared to nonsurgical management.
High mortality of AEF post-AF ablation warrants clinical vigilance; multicenter registry leaves open optimal preventive strategies.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but devastating complication with high mortality post atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The purpose of current study was to determine the epidemiology, clinical features, pathogenesis, and management of AEF after AF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with diagnosed AEF were included and retrospectively analyzed according to the registry of 11 centers in China from January 2010 to December 2019. A total of 16 AEF cases were identified from 44 794 patients who received a left atrial ablation procedure (0.035% per procedure). The interval from procedure to clinical onset of AEF averaged 18.3 days (3-39 days). The fever ranked the most common symptom, occurred in 14 of the 16 cases, followed by neurological deficits (n = 11), chest pain (n = 5), and hematemesis (n = 4). Patients undergoing surgical repair had a better prognosis compared to those receiving nonsurgical management ([4 of 8] 50.0% vs [8 of 8] 100%, P < .05) with an overall mortality rate of 75.0%. CONCLUSION: AEF is highly characterized by varied manifestations. Early diagnosis and urgent surgical repair are vital to those patients and associated with improved survival rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: