Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to assess the correlation between (18)F-FDG uptake values on positron emission mammography (PEM), expressed as maximum uptake value and lesion-to-background ratio, and receptor status (i.e., estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]), tumor histology, and tumor grade. We also evaluated for the correlation between maximum uptake value on PEM and maximum uptake value on a whole-body PET/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our database for patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer who were referred for PEM between June 2007 and September 2009. A subset of patients also underwent a whole-body PET/CT scan. The original pathology reports were reviewed to establish the histologic type, grade, and receptor status. RESULTS: The study involved 98 patients with 100 lesions. ER-negative tumors and PR-negative tumors had significantly higher mean lesion-to-background ratio than did their respective receptor-positive tumors (p = 0.02). Triple-negative tumors (i.e., ER-negative, PR-negative, and HER2-negative tumors) had statistically higher mean lesion-to-background ratio than did ER-positive PR-positive HER2-negative tumors (p = 0.04). Infiltrating ductal carcinomas had significantly higher PEM FDG uptake values than did infiltrating lobular carcinomas (p = 0.02-0.04). Breast tumors with higher histologic grade also had significantly higher PEM FDG uptake values than did those with lower grade (p = 0.03 and p < 0.001). A moderately high correlation (0.76-0.79) was seen between whole-body PET/CT and PEM uptake values. CONCLUSION: This study shows a correlation between PEM FDG uptake values and the prognostic factors that have been shown to predict breast cancer survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: