Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article positions occupational therapy as a reflexive system within trauma care. Drawing from a systems-theoretical perspective, we contrast trauma-focused and non-trauma-focused models—which rely on codings such as integrated/nonintegrated and regulated/dysregulated—with occupational therapy’s guiding distinction of participation/non-participation. We show that therapeutic relevance emerges through meaningful engagement—not predefined interventions. Occupational therapy thus enables trauma care without prescribing change, processing, or resolution. By suspending transformation as a prerequisite for trauma care, occupational therapy offers a structurally open and reflexive response to trauma. The article develops this position theoretically and illustrates its implications through case examples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Staller et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: