This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: To study whether knowledge about psychosocial work indicators and a structured method to implement changes based on such knowledge comprise an effective management tool for enhancing organizational as well as employee health and well-being. METHODS: White- collar employees representing 22 different work units were assessed before and after a 1-year intervention program. Subjective ratings on health and work environment, biologic markers, absenteeism, and productivity were measured. RESULTS: Significant improvements in performance feedback, participatory management, employeeship, skills development, efficiency, leadership, employee well-being, and work-related exhaustion were identified. The restorative hormone testosterone increased during the intervention and changes correlated with increased overall organizational well-being. Absenteeism decreased and productivity improved. CONCLUSIONS: Fact-based psychosocial workplace interventions are suggested to be an important process for enhancing employee well-being as well as organizational performance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
n et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: