Why the study?
Whether neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, a marker of systemic inflammation, is associated with endothelial dysfunction in people living with HIV on stable ART had not been investigated.
Is neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio associated with endothelial dysfunction in people living with HIV on stable antiretroviral therapy?
Is neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio associated with endothelial dysfunction in people living with HIV on stable antiretroviral therapy?
Although NLR is inversely associated with bFMD in HIV patients with high NLR on stable ART, it has low discriminatory ability for predicting endothelial dysfunction.
BACKGROUND: Residual inflammation is thought to promote endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease risk among people living with HIV (PLWH) receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). Whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a putative marker of systemic inflammation, may be associated with endothelial dysfunction has not been investigated in PLWH on stable ART. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 210 PLWH (mean age 49 years, 79% males, 88/7/5% Caucasians/Africans/Hispanics) on long-term ART (median ART duration 8 years) were enrolled among those who were afferent to an Infectious Diseases outpatient clinic. The association between NLR and brachial flow-mediated dilation (bFMD) was analysed. RESULTS: A curvilinear association was observed between logarithmic-NLR and logarithmic-bFMD (R square = 0.034, p = 0.027), with logarithmic-bFMD decreasing significantly with increasing logarithmic-NLR only in PLWH with high NLR (≥1.47, median NLR) (r = -0.369, p < 0.001). However, NLR had a poor accuracy in the prediction of low bFMD (≤4.55, median bFMD) in PLWH with high NLR (55% sensitivity, 80% specificity, Youden index 0.35 for NLR 2.20). CONCLUSIONS: Although there is an inverse association between NLR and bFMD among long-term ART-treated PLWH with high NLR, NLR has a low discriminatory ability toward endothelial dysfunction in this category of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bianconi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: