Key result
Socioeconomic status shows no link to in-hospital survival in STEMI patients receiving pharmacoinvasive therapy.
Why the study?
The impact of socioeconomic status on cardiovascular outcomes is known internationally, but its association with in-hospital survival in STEMI patients treated with a pharmacoinvasive strategy required evaluation.
Does socioeconomic status influence in-hospital survival and immediate outcomes in patients with STEMI treated with a pharmacoinvasive strategy?
Cohort (n=694)
No
Does socioeconomic status influence in-hospital survival and immediate outcomes in patients with STEMI treated with a pharmacoinvasive strategy?
Absolute Event Rate: 95.6% vs 94.8%
p-value: p=0.61
In a Mexican cohort with universal healthcare access, socioeconomic status did not significantly influence in-hospital survival or immediate outcomes in STEMI patients treated with a pharmacoinvasive strategy.
Objective: In different countries, the impact of the socioeconomic status (SES) associated with different cardiovascular risk factors, incidence, and outcomes, including mortality, has been described.The objective was to determine the in-hospital survival in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with a pharmacoinvasive strategy according to their SES.Methods: A retrospective, unicentric, cohort-type observational study was carried out, involving 694 patients diagnosed with STEMI from March 2018 to April 2022 treated with a pharmacoinvasive strategy.Results: The study population was young, with an average age of 58 years.Systemic arterial hypertension, smoking, and diabetes were the most prevalent risk factors in the population regardless of SES.Chronic kidney disease was more prevalent in the SES ≥ 2 group.There were no differences in mortality; the total ischemic time was an average of 5 hours for both groups.There were no significant differences in the times and final outcomes of pharmacoinvasive therapy, with percentiles 25-75 of 6.9 to 48 h, and with a success rate of 62.7%.Conclusions: The SES does not have an influence on the characteristics of the population and immediate outcomes, which is consistent with reports from countries with universal healthcare services, unlike countries with greater healthcare system restrictions due to the use of insurers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barragán-Hernández et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=694). Socioeconomic status (SES ≥ 2) vs. Socioeconomic status (SES 1x-1) was evaluated on In-hospital survival (p=0.61). Socioeconomic status did not significantly influence in-hospital survival (95.6% vs 94.8%, p=0.61) in patients with STEMI treated with a pharmacoinvasive strategy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: