Systematic review synthesizes cost-effectiveness evidence of preschool hearing screening, indicating context-dependent factors influence outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: This review synthesises economic evidence for pre-school hearing screening, a debated strategy for detecting hearing loss missed by newborn programs. DESIGN: Following PRISMA guidelines, A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed was performed from database inception through March 2025. The review included full economic evaluations (cost-effectiveness analyses) reporting cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) or Disability-Adjusted Life Year (DALY). STUDY SAMPLE: Four decision-analytic modelling studies included. The studies were from the United Kingdom, Iran, and Australia, focusing on screening children at or before primary school entry. RESULTS: Evidence synthesis revealed significant heterogeneity. Three studies were cost-effective, while one suggested it was not. This divergence was strongly influenced by methodological factors: the modelled time horizon, the choice of outcome metric (QALY vs. DALY), and the baseline coverage of UNHS. For instance, the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio for pure-tone screening fell from $5,814/QALY over one year to $401/QALY over an 11-year horizon. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of pre-school hearing screening is highly context-dependent. Key determinants include existing UNHS infrastructure, the chosen screening technology, and the evaluation time horizon. Policymakers must consider these local factors to implement the most economically viable strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fazelian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: