This article examines the urban imaginary, revealing its complex role in shaping cultural and political landscapes.
In this article I consider the significance of the urban imaginary as a distinctive kind of cultural and political formation. I take the notion of the imaginary from an implicit singularity towards a more variegated and pluriversal conceptual field, extending to diverse kinds of ecological, techno-futurist, and speculative formulations. I argue that the discursive terrain of the urban imaginary is not reducible to that of culture or ideology and is better conceived as a useful yet somewhat underexplored dimension to a series of disparate and often contradictory aspects to modernity and the conceptualization of alternative futures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew Gandy (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: