Key result
XGBoost machine learning model accurately predicts early DVT in elderly ICU patients with ~0.84 AUC.
Why the study?
Deep vein thrombosis is a frequent complication in elderly ICU patients, but reliable prediction tools for this population remain limited.
Can an interpretable machine learning model accurately predict early incident deep vein thrombosis in elderly ICU patients?
Cohort (n=2,250)
Yes
Can an interpretable machine learning model accurately predict early incident deep vein thrombosis in elderly ICU patients?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.843 (95% CI 0.779-0.893)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.843% vs 0.815%
An interpretable XGBoost machine learning model using routinely available clinical variables accurately predicts early incident deep vein thrombosis in elderly ICU patients.
May aid DVT risk stratification in elderly ICU patients; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical use.
Background Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a frequent complication in elderly intensive care unit (ICU) patients, while reliable prediction tools for this population remain limited. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of DVT in critically ill elderly patients. Methods In this multicenter retrospective study, ICU patients aged ≥ 75 years from two tertiary medical centers in China were enrolled. Patients with pre-existing DVT were excluded. A development cohort (Suzhou, n = 1,717) and an external validation cohort (Xi’an, n = 533) were established. Clinical variables collected within 24 h after ICU admission were used to predict incident DVT during ICU stay. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was applied for feature selection, and four machine learning models were developed and compared. Model discrimination, calibration, and interpretability were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), calibration analysis, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results DVT occurred in 15.2% and 21.0% of patients in the development and external validation cohorts, respectively. Among the evaluated models, XGBoost achieved the best performance, with AUCs of 0.843 in internal validation and 0.811 in external validation. Calibration analysis demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed risks. Key predictors included D-dimer, C-reactive protein, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, procalcitonin, mechanical ventilation, and mechanical thromboprophylaxis. SHAP analysis quantified the contribution of individual predictors. Conclusions We developed and externally validated an interpretable machine learning model for early DVT prediction in elderly ICU patients. The model may support risk stratification and clinical decision-making in critical care settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (n=2,250). XGBoost machine learning model vs. Logistic regression was evaluated on Prediction of incident deep vein thrombosis (DVT) during ICU stay (AUC 0.843, 95% CI 0.779-0.893). An XGBoost machine learning model accurately predicted early deep vein thrombosis in elderly ICU patients, achieving an AUC of 0.843 in internal validation and 0.811 in external validation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: