Pathological diagnosis of biopsies remains the gold standard for gastric diseases such as gastric carcinoma (GC), but it suffers from clinical misdiagnosis and high workload. Accurately distinguishing early-stage GC (EGC) from advanced-stage GC (AGC) and preoperatively predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) are crucial for precise treatment; however, this remains a challenge in biopsies. To address these challenges, we retrospectively collected 20,711 whole-slide images (WSIs) from 17,086 patients across six centers and prospectively enrolled 3698 WSIs from 2965 patients to develop and validate a gastric biopsy artificial intelligence model (GBAIM), which performed six-class classification on WSIs. GBAIM achieved 96.1% sensitivity and 95.0% specificity in external cohorts, and 93.4% and 99.0% in the prospective cohort, respectively, demonstrating excellent performance and strong generalization ability. GBAIM enhanced the performance of all nine pathologists in auxiliary diagnostic experiments, raising their accuracy by 1.7%–39.0%, while reducing diagnostic time by 29.4%–50.5%. Besides, the fine-tuned GBAIM-T, which aims to differentiate EGC from AGC, achieved an AUC of 0.907 and 0.826 on internal and external testing sets, respectively, and GBAIM-N, which aims to predict LNM, achieved an AUC of 0.814 and 0.706 on internal and external testing sets, respectively. Taken together, GBAIM is a valuable tool in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: