Experimental study investigates how different shapes of floating breakwaters affect wave reduction, highlighting practical use.
Floating breakwaters (FBWs) offer a sustainable alternative for coastal protection against wave-induced erosion. However, the influence of cross-sectional geometry on attenuation performance remains insufficiently quantified. Therefore, this study experimentally investigates the hydrodynamic performance of modular FBWs, focusing on the wave transmission across three distinct profiles: rectangular, triangular, and trapezoidal. These geometries were selected to systematically evaluate the effect of slope angle and wave-surface interaction on wave attenuation. The tested rectangular FBW exhibited a baseline wave attenuation efficiency of 47%, which was systematically improved through geometric modification. Among the three tested inclination angles (α = 30°, 45°, and 60°), the triangular FBW achieved its optimal performance at 30°, reaching an average efficiency of 66%, representing a 19% improvement over the rectangular FBW while requiring 56% less material. The trapezoidal profile demonstrated the highest performance, reaching an average efficiency of 83%. Furthermore, geometric orientation dictates the hydrodynamic mechanism; an upright side-slope configuration outperformed the inverted orientation. In addition, positioning the sloped face on the leeward side enhanced wave attenuation compared to seaward placement. Consequently, a trapezoidal profile with a leeward-oriented slope is recommended for practical implementation because it offers the best balance between hydrodynamic performance, inherent hydrostatic stability, and constructability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashraf et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: