Randomized trial evaluates parenting outcomes in parents with ADHD symptoms, suggesting potential benefits of coaching.
Introduction: Many parents of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) experience mental health challenges that may hinder engagement in behavioral parent training. This pilot randomized trial evaluated the feasibility and acceptability, and explored preliminary parent-related outcomes, of Parental Friendship Coaching+ (PFC+). PFC+ is an engagement-enhanced adaptation of Parental Friendship Coaching (PFC) for parents with elevated ADHD and/or depressive symptoms raising children with ADHD and peer difficulties. PFC trains parents to support their child’s friendships through social coaching. Method: Thirty-three Canadian parents ( M age = 38.9 years; 97% mothers) were randomized to 6 weeks of PFC+ ( n = 18) or waitlist control ( n = 15). Afterward, control parents received PFC+, while PFC+ parents entered naturalistic follow-up. PFC+ included participation-enhancing adaptations (e.g., one-time workshop, flexible coaching, online delivery) and connection-promoting adaptations (e.g., extended intake, treatment menu, peer-pairing). Results: On primary outcomes of treatment engagement, session completion was 97%, homework adherence averaged 81%, and alliance ratings were strong. Exploratory parent-related outcomes included parenting stress, parenting competence, and parenting behavior pre- to post-program. Compared to controls, PFC+ parents reported greater parenting competence and friendship facilitation, and reduced criticism, with medium but nonsignificant effects. In contrast, children reported declines in parents’ positive involvement and friendship facilitation, and co-parents reported mixed, nonsignificant effects. Parenting stress declined in both PFC+ and control groups. Discussion: Findings support further evaluation of PFC+ as a potentially scalable, engagement-focused adaptation of behavioral parent training for families facing parent mental health barriers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smit et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: