Why the study?
Tedious parameter settings and poor performances seriously affect the effectiveness of entropy estimation in time series analysis.
The proposed CDEn algorithm provides a high-performance, parameter-free method for entropy estimation in nonstationary time series analysis, outperforming existing methods in accuracy and stability.
May enhance time series analysis in cardiology; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
Tedious parameter settings and poor performances seriously affect the entropy estimation's effectiveness in time series analysis. To solve these limits, we propose a conceptually novel definition, cumulative diversity pattern entropy (CDEn), focusing on eliminating parameter selections and improving quantization accuracy, stability, and robustness. The CDEn algorithm consists of three steps: 1) improved phase-space reconstruction (IPSR) with constant embedding dimension$m= 2$and time delayτ =1; 2) diversity pattern partition generated by the cosine similarity between adjacent vectors; and 3) entropy calculation based on the normalized cumulative probability distribution. Numerical experiments are performed using 7 synthetic datasets and 15 baseline entropy methods for comparative validation. The results confirm CDEn's best description of chaotic/stochastic dynamics with the highest quantization accuracy and the lowest error rate of 2.04%. The coefficient of variation (CV) results also verify CDEn's excellent quantization stability with CV lower than 10−2. The relative change rate results demonstrate that CDEn achieves the best robustness to data length and noise. Finally, the entropy algorithms are applied to a real-world dataset, i.e., neonatal sleep EEG analysis. The results further confirm that suggested CDEn outperforms the state-of-the-art entropy methods, with the minimum outliers and best statistical significance (highest mean of effect size, 1.22) in characterizing the neurodynamics of different sleep stages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: