Why the study?
Does telemedicine-supported discharge prevent readmission within 28 days in low-acuity patients receiving in-home care?
Does telemedicine-supported discharge prevent readmission within 28 days in low-acuity patients receiving in-home care?
Telemedicine-supported discharge for low-acuity in-home care patients appears safe, with no significant difference in 28-day readmission rates compared to in-person discharge.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enable earlier discharge for select in-home patients; leaves open confirmation of safety in randomized trials.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if mobile videoconferencing technology can facilitate the discharge of low-acuity patients receiving in-home care without compromising short-term health outcomes. METHODS: A 6-month trial commenced in July 2015 with 345 patients considered unsuited to Criteria Led Discharge (CLD) receiving in-home care included as participants. Nurses providing clinical support to patients in their homes were supplied with a tablet computer (Apple iPad) with Internet connectivity (Telstra 4G Network) and videoconferencing software (Cisco Jabber for Telepresence). Device usage data combined with hospital admission records were collected to determine (a) instances where a telemedicine-facilitated discharge occurred and (b) if the accepted measure of short-term health outcomes (readmission within 28 days) was adversely affected by this alternative method. RESULTS: Telemedicine technology facilitated the discharge of 10.1% (n = 35) of patients considered unsuitable for CLD from the Hospital in the Home model during the trial period. Statistically insignificant differences in rates of readmission between patients discharged in person versus those participating in the telemedicine-supported model suggest that the clinical standards of the service have been maintained. CONCLUSION: The results of evaluating telemedicine support for nurses providing low-acuity in-home care indicate that patients may be discharged remotely while maintaining the existing clinical standards of the service.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenup et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: