Why the study?
Does incremental spinal anaesthesia reduce perioperative myocardial ischaemia and hypotension compared to single-dose spinal or general anaesthesia in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing hip fracture surgery?
Does incremental spinal anaesthesia reduce perioperative myocardial ischaemia and hypotension compared to single-dose spinal or general anaesthesia in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing hip fracture surgery?
Incremental spinal anaesthesia reduces the incidence of perioperative hypotension and myocardial ischaemia compared to single-dose spinal or general anaesthesia in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing hip surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports incremental spinal anaesthesia in CAD patients for hip fracture surgery; extends RCT evidence favoring titrated neuraxial over single-shot or general techniques.
Juelsgaard et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: